What distinguishes the various ethical theories when addressing dilemmas?

The correct response highlights the fundamental difference among ethical theories in how they approach moral dilemmas. Specifically, some theories, such as consequentialism, prioritize the outcomes of actions and judge their morality based on the results they produce. This means that the ends can justify the means, depending on the context and consequences.

On the other hand, deontological theories emphasize duties and rules, asserting that certain actions are inherently right or wrong regardless of their consequences. This distinction impacts how ethical dilemmas are resolved, as individuals may arrive at different conclusions based on whether they prioritize outcomes or adherence to moral duties.

The other options do not accurately capture the essence of the diversity in ethical theories. For instance, while many ethical theories may address similar principles, they do not all focus on the same ones, leading to differing conclusions in ethical dilemmas. Also, ethical theories do not universally prioritize group outcomes over individual rights; the balance of the two can vary significantly between theories. Lastly, not all ethical perspectives advocate for absolute moral rules, as some theories allow for flexibility based on context, making the landscape of ethical reasoning quite varied.